How Would You Improve Police Recruitment and Retention? Lieutenant Interview Question & Answer
QUICK ANSWER
A strong lieutenant answer on recruitment and retention separates what’s outside the role’s control — pay, benefits, the broader police environment — from what’s within it: public perception, leadership style, and department culture. The most effective approach focuses on two concrete actions within a lieutenant’s reach: working with the public information officer to shape positive public perception, and leading in a way that makes officers want to stay, since retention ultimately comes down to people staying for good leadership rather than leaving because of poor leadership.
Police lieutenant assessment questions on recruitment and retention have become increasingly common over the past few years. As you move from sergeant to lieutenant, you might not immediately see what you can do to directly impact recruitment and retention — after all, many factors related to working conditions and benefits are outside your control now, and will remain outside your control once you’re promoted. That said, you’ll set yourself apart from other candidates if you go beyond simply acknowledging the issue and instead describe the concrete steps you’ll take to have a real impact on it.
“If you are looking for a well designed assessment / oral interview study program this is the one. The program is very reasonably priced, so don’t risk your career watching free videos or just reading articles on line. If you’re serious about getting promoted, invest in your career and use The Oral Boards Made Easy program. It will help you get promoted.”
-Promoted to Lieutenant in Massachusetts
Interview Question
"What recommendations do you have to improve police recruitment and retention at our agency?"
ANSWER TRANSCRIPT:
Acknowledge the Problem and Establish Credibility
“The recruitment and retention of police officers is a current challenge at our police department and at many other departments. As a sergeant, I live with this challenge day in and day out. Often we do not have the needed staffing for a shift and we are compelling officers to work overtime. Because this has been happening for a while now, this forced overtime is creating lower morale and increased burnout. Obviously, these are issues of concern.
I’ll break down my recruitment and retention recommendations into two major areas: those that will be within my direct control as a lieutenant and those outside of my control. I will start with the latter.”
Name the Factors Outside Your Control
“Major areas that I believe will improve recruitment and retention but that are outside of my control are in the areas of benefits, media generated public opinion, and the rapidly changing police environment. It makes sense that competitive pay, medical insurance, and retirement benefits are attractive to personnel, both present and prospective. When any of these are deficient as compared to neighboring agencies, our agency becomes less attractive. And while I put media generated public opinion and the rapidly changing police environment into areas outside of my control, I also recognize there are things that I have been doing as a sergeant and will continue to do as a lieutenant to have a positive impact in those areas.”
Pivot to What You Can Control
“I recognize that my effectiveness in my leadership role can have an impact on both recruitment and retention. As for recruitment, it comes down to ensuring that our agency is portrayed as a positive and desirable place to work. As for retention, it comes down to officers feeling valued. It has often been said that workers do not quit their employers, they quit their bosses. Here is how I expect to influence these areas as a lieutenant.”
Recruitment: Work With the PIO and Build a Culture of Pride
“I will engage with our public information officer frequently to provide that person with positive content that can be disseminated through either social media, mainstream media, or both. Certainly, social media gives us the opportunity to send unfiltered messages to the public and our personnel that highlights the good work being done and to put us in a positive light. To the extent that we can be seen positively in the mainstream media as well, that becomes a bonus for us as a department. This can have our department seen by those who are considering a police career as the most desirable agency to work for.
“I will also reinforce to my personnel – officers, sergeants, and civilians – that external conversations both on and off duty that show pride in our agency can have a positive impact on public opinion. This is something that I have been committed to for years and something that I will continue to model as a lieutenant. It essentially turns every member of our department into a recruiter rather than just relying on a few to attract the masses.”
Retention: Lead in a Way That Makes People Want to Stay
“With regards to retention, I’ll be a good leader. A leader who cares about his employees, is clear with consistent expectations, treats employees fairly while holding them accountable to their responsibilities, and challenges them to be their best while being there to support them as they navigate the frequently changing environment of policing. I’ll be the leader that has them wanting to stay, not the one that gives them a reason to leave.”
Frame It as a People Problem, Not a Resources Problem
“I see recruitment and retention as primarily a people, rather than resources, issue. We see many officers leaving one department to go to another department. We need to study the departments that are doing the best job in attracting personnel and emulate what they are doing well. In my experience, this often comes down to a department that lateral transfers see as a premier department – one that they are proud to belong to. I will do my best to influence that sense of pride in my personnel so that is the message that they are confidently spreading externally.”
Closing
“And those are my recommendations on how I can impact recruitment and retention as a lieutenant.”
Why This Answer Works
Raters score this question on whether you can separate what you can influence from what you can’t — and whether you actually offer something concrete once you get there. This answer scores well because it:
- Splits the problem into controllable and uncontrollable factors. This isn’t just an organizing device — it demonstrates the kind of judgment boards are testing for at the lieutenant level: recognizing organizational constraints without using them as an excuse to avoid offering a real plan.
- Doesn’t stop at acknowledging pay and benefits. Many candidates stop at “pay and benefits are the issue,” which is true but unhelpful, since a lieutenant candidate typically has no authority over compensation. This answer treats that as a given and moves quickly to what’s actually within reach.
- Gives two distinct, concrete actions. Working with the PIO on messaging and leading in a way that reduces turnover are both specific enough that a follow-up question (“tell me more about that”) has somewhere to go — a board can visualize the candidate actually doing these things.
- Reframes recruitment as a whole-department effort. The line about turning “every member of our department into a recruiter” is a strong, quotable idea that shows systems thinking rather than a top-down view of the problem.
- Ends on retention through leadership, not perks. Closing on “they quit their bosses, not their employers” ties the whole answer back to something the candidate personally controls, which is the strongest note to end on in front of a board evaluating leadership potential.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Don’t spend the whole answer describing the recruitment and retention problem without pivoting to what you personally would do about it — boards already know the problem exists.
- Don’t over-promise on things outside your authority (setting pay scales, changing benefits packages) — this can come across as either naive or as overstepping the lieutenant role.
- Don’t ignore the “quit their boss” angle — if you only talk about programs and policy, you miss the chance to demonstrate personal leadership philosophy, which boards specifically want to see at this rank.
Frequently Asked Questions
Acknowledge that honestly, since boards will already know it. Then pivot quickly to what you can influence regardless of budget: public perception, leadership style, and department culture. A candidate who only says “we need more money” hasn’t answered the question a lieutenant is actually being asked.
Reframe the answer around sustaining and protecting what’s working, and describe how you’d stay alert to early warning signs (rising overtime, exit interview trends, informal complaints) so the department doesn’t lose ground. Boards still want to hear a leadership philosophy, not just “we’re fine.”
Only if you can speak to them accurately and they’re realistic for your agency to implement — vague references to programs you haven’t researched can undermine an otherwise strong answer. It’s safer to focus on leadership behaviors you can commit to personally, which is what this sample answer does.
Common follow-ups include asking for a specific example of something you’ve already done to improve morale or public perception, or asking how you’d measure whether your recruitment efforts are actually working.
Bill Reilly
Watch FREE:
On-Demand Seminar Module 1:
Introduction
